opt-in
Lo! A different guy just popped up in my Linkedin feed to say that cold leads are cool, because they’re not illegal. (I’ve heard it before.) And for a bonus, he wants to argue about whether or not cold lead emails truly are “spam” — he says no. That’s fine, everybody’s free to have their own take, but if you’re loading my email address into an automation tool to send me an email, and I didn’t give affirmative consent to indicate my desire to receive that email, it’s spam. The law literally says that you have to label your mail as an unsolicited advertisement if you don’t have that consent. It’s not new, it’s not groundbreaking, it’s just the basic tenet of permission marketing via email. But, fine. “That’s my opinion,” even though it’s what the law says. And it’s not “just” my opinion. I think it’s observably unwanted and
Another day brings us another simple reminder that buying lists will cause you trouble. Toshi Onishi, writing for the Dotdigital blog, succinctly shares with us the three major issues around transparency (and consent) that comprise insurmountable roadblocks when it comes to purchasing email lists. And if you need more ammo to help explain to a boss or marketing manager why buying lists isn’t cool, don’t forget to check out https://www.shouldiuseapurchasedemaillist.com where you’ll find more links to articles that break down why it’s a bad practice and so broadly prohibited.
Jennifer Nespola Lantz’s recent post about Gmail potentially offering political senders a fast pass method to the inbox has gotten me thinking about the spam fight we went through back in the olden times. Before CAN-SPAM, domain reputation and deliverability best practices. There was a time back in those bad old days when the marketing industry mega-group Direct Marketing Association tried to convince the world that opt-out was the best path for email marketing. The arguments as to why this absolutely horseshit plan was supposed to be okay varied; free speech, growth of the economy, support for small businesses, whatever. Everybody should be allowed the chance to hit your inbox at least once, they said; and then you could just tell the sender; each sender, individually, to stop emailing you. They loved touting two things. First was an “opt-out registry” service called e-MPS. Smart netizens knew that allowing this to proceed would
Today’s guest post comes from my colleague Jennifer Nespola Lantz, VP of Industry Relations and Deliverability at Kickbox, keeping us updated on a potentially upcoming Gmail spam filtering process change that is likely to have a great impact upon all of us. Take it away, Jen!On June 28th, I saw a news article by Axios reporting that “Google moves to keep campaign messages out of spam.” At first glance I was very surprised about the statement knowing all Gmail does to protect users and how hands off they tend to be (outside of the machines doing their magic.) What I originally defined as campaign messages was coming from a too in-the-weeds mental dictionary about email production. I always coined campaigns as a singular email marketing effort. And then I read it…”Google has asked the Federal Election Commission to green light a program that could keep campaign emails from ending up
Previously I’ve talked about the affirmative consent standard found in the US federal anti-spam law (CAN-SPAM). I’ve found it very useful test when trying to understand if a process is appropriately opt-in our not. Wondering if GDPR has something similar? It does.For various reasons, the UK and the EU have slightly differing versions of GDPR, but the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office provides us with a pretty good guide for email marketing permission standards, and I think it’s a good starting point to learn about opt-in requirements EU-wide.The ICO explains that “Consent requests need to be prominent, concise, easy to understand and separate from any other information such as general terms and conditions.”Opt-in is key — see “What methods can we use to obtain consent?” for more details. No pre-checked box, not hidden in terms and conditions, and make it easy to understand.The handy website GDPR.eu, put together by Proton AG
Kickbox interviewed a bunch of us to find out what methods of opt-in we recommend. Go check it out. What’s your favourite method of opt-in?